TODAY'S NEWS FOR
TODAY'S CHURCH
Today's News
• Murder by Abortion
• Freedom of Speech
• Abominations
• Politics 2002
• Letters to the Editor
• Jim Rudd
• Chuck Baldwin
• Paul deParrie
• Dave Black
• Al Cronkrite

Resources:
Crisis Pregnancy?
Abortion Aftercare
The Study Room
Prayer Closet
Election & Voters Info
News Archives
Commentary Archives

Special Reports:
Injured After RU-486?
Get Help & Support Now
The Florida Vote
A Chronological History.
The Baby Parts Industry
Follow the Money
Search for Eric Rudolph
Chronological Updates
Death of Jesse Dirkhising
A Tale of Torture

Homeschool Favorites:
The Easter Story
American Heritage
The Christmas Story

Contact Us:
Subscribe Now
FREE Daily Email Update
Email the Editor


Jim Rudd                                                                       March 26, 2001
     

America's Prima Nocta

The news from England about a father going to court in an attempt to save his unborn child from abortion has gained worldwide attention. The British court temporarily postponed the abortion to make sure all the proper forms were filled out, but, made it absolutely clear that British fathers have no legal rights to protect their children as long as their children are unborn.

This situation reminded me of a scene in Mel Gibson's movie Brave Heart. People who have seen it will remember that the pagan King, Edward the Longshanks, had given his English Noblemen land in Scotland, and then granted them the right of "Prima Nocta" (Latin for "First Night") stating, "When any common girl inhabiting their lands is married, our Nobles shall have sexual rights to her on the night of her wedding."

All of you Brave Heart fans know that the King's civil decree against the institution of marriage in Scotland is what led to the rebellion and their subsequent freedom from English tyranny. For those of you who did not see the movie, Prima Nocta was used by heathen feudal governments as a means to control the population of countries they ruled by bastardizing the first born males and therefore cutting them off from any lawful claim of inheritance.

I think people can agree that the attack on the marriage institution here in the United States is more subtle than the feudal decree of Prima Nocta. However, subtle intrusion by the State does not necessarily mean it is any less harmful. In fact, the way U.S. Court decisions have stripped fathers of the freedom to protect their unborn children is far more treacherous and controlling than bastardizing the first born males.

For example, before 1973 our civil laws recognized that when a husband and wife conceived a child that: the husband was the father; the wife was the mother; and together with their child they constituted a "nuclear family." However, with decisions like Roe v. Wade it is the court's opinion that there is no child at conception. Today, States call the child in the womb a "potential life," and as long as the child is in the womb the husband is called the "prospective father."

In effect, these court opinions allow the states to strip husbands of their legal right to be recognized as the fathers of their children until the children are actually born. By defiling the marriage bed at the moment of conception, the State destroys both marriage and the family at their core.

By usurping the headship of the husband, the State assumes the role of the husband and transfers to the wife the authority "to choose" between life and death and, whether or not she wants the "usurped man" to be co-parent of her future child.

Since our civil government began usurping the proper headship and authority structure of husbands and fathers, we are witnessing a total degeneration of our society. We see the breakdown of the administration of discipline in the family concerning children, the breakdown of the administration of discipline in the Church concerning sin, and the breakdown of the administration of discipline in civil government concerning Justice.

So the question is, since Christian men have surrendered the headship responsibility of being the legal husband and father at the moment of conception, then what makes us think we can claim that freedom after the child is born? Or, to claim any freedom that is related to being husbands and fathers?

The answer is, men cannot claim a freedom they do not have. It either can be granted to them like a servant receives a privilege from his master -- the State, or, men can be men and take back from the usurper what is rightfully theirs.

God established the divine ordinance of marriage in the very beginning after the creation of Adam and Eve, (Gen.2:24). The preeminence of the marriage institution is confirmed by Christ, (Matt. l9:4-5). Upon this institution God stamped His own name and excellence, making it a glorious and honorable state under the stewardship of His Church (1 Cor. 11:3; Eph. 5:22-33). God created life, then He instituted marriage, then the nuclear family, with the husband and father as the head of the family, and with Christ as head of the man.

Now here is the key point that Christians in America need to understand about the catastrophic effect these U.S. Court decisions have in stripping husbands and fathers of their legal rights at the moment of conception. Since the fundamental Law of marriage and its authority structure was instituted in the very beginning of mankind's existence, then the Family, Church, Society, and Civil Governments are successionally dependent on the marriage institution.

Without the marriage institution being based on God's ordained authority structure all other subsequent institutions -- Family, Church, Society, and Civil Governments, will degenerate into chaos, and then oblivion.

Husband and wife, being joined together by the ordinance of God, are not to be put asunder (separated) by any ordinance of man. "What therefore God hath joined together," Christ tells His Church, "let not man put asunder." (Matt. 19:6)

When we look at this situation as a whole -- the defilement of the marriage bed -- the usurpation of both the headship of men as husbands, and their legal right as fathers to protect their children -- the State as the surrogate husband providing for mothers to murder their children, we can see how Christian leadership is failing in their duty to "let not" the ordinances of man "put asunder" the marriage institution and, therefore, continue to allow the State to usurp God's ordained authority structure at the moment of conception.

Christian husbands and fathers must stand up and order the Usurper to get out of their bedroom! Men must demand that their state governors, legislators and the President of the United States pass laws which recognize the Unalienable Personhood of every human being from the moment of conception until natural death. For every unborn child has the Unalienable right to be protected by his father.

Jim Rudd
Washington, D.C., Director
Christian Street Preachers Alliance
email: editor@covenantnews.com


More from Jim Rudd

TODAY'S NEWS    Murder by Abortion    Freedom of Speech    Court News Report    Politics       Family Topic